- PE 150
- Posts
- Latin America Private Capital Fundraising Report
Latin America Private Capital Fundraising Report
From PE Dominance to Multi-Strategy Maturity: Capital Concentration, Manager Expansion, and the Rise of Real Assets (2006–1H 2025)
I. Introduction — Financing Markets Enter a New Competitive Era
For years, the evolution of private market financing appeared to follow a relatively straightforward trajectory. Traditional banks pulled back under regulatory pressure, syndicated markets became more volatile, and private credit stepped in to fill the gap with speed, flexibility, and certainty of execution.
What began as an alternative financing solution has since evolved into one of the most influential forces in modern dealmaking.
But as private credit continues scaling into larger and more complex transactions, the market is entering a new phase — one defined less by disruption alone and more by competition, coexistence, and growing structural complexity.
Today, the debate is no longer simply whether private credit can compete with banks. In many areas of the market, it already does. The more important question is what the next stage of this competitive dynamic looks like:
• Where do banks still maintain an edge?
• Is private credit becoming too crowded?
• How are sponsors thinking about execution versus pricing?
• And will the future financing landscape ultimately favor banks, private lenders, or some combination of both?
To better understand how market participants are navigating these shifts, PE150 conducted a four-part microsurvey series across private equity sponsors, bankers, consultants, and other market participants. The surveys explored the evolving balance of power between traditional lenders and private credit funds, while also examining perceived vulnerabilities, competitive positioning, and the long-term direction of deal financing markets.
The findings reveal an industry in transition — not replacement.
Across nearly every question, perceptions diverged meaningfully depending on where respondents sit within the ecosystem. Sponsors consistently prioritized certainty and flexibility. Banks remained confident in their competitive relevance, particularly in larger and relationship-driven transactions. Consultants often took the most cautious view, highlighting concerns around overcrowding, underwriting discipline, and the sustainability of current market dynamics.
At the same time, one broader theme emerged consistently throughout the data: financing markets are becoming increasingly fragmented and hybridized.
Rather than consolidating around a single dominant capital provider, the market appears to be moving toward a more flexible ecosystem where syndicated lenders, direct lenders, structured capital providers, and bespoke financing solutions coexist within the same transaction environment. Competitive advantage is becoming more situational — shaped by deal size, sponsor quality, sector exposure, execution timelines, and capital availability.
This report analyzes the key findings from each microsurvey and examines what they collectively reveal about the future of private market financing. As capital providers continue competing for relevance in a changing macro environment, understanding these shifts will be critical for sponsors, lenders, advisors, and investors alike.
II. Who’s Winning the Financing Battle? It Depends Who You Ask
Private credit has been one of the most talked-about forces in dealmaking—but when it comes to actual competitiveness on financing, the picture is more nuanced.
Our latest PE150 microsurvey (N=93) reveals a market that’s far from one-sided:
40% of all respondents say banks and private credit are equally competitive
27% believe private credit funds are more competitive
33% still favor traditional banks
Translation: there’s no clear winner—yet.
But the real story emerges when you break it down by role:
Bankers are the most likely to call it a tie (45%), with only 27% conceding an edge to private credit—suggesting continued confidence in bank-led financing.
PE sponsors, on the other hand, are decisively leaning toward private credit:
41% say private credit is more competitive
Just 27% favor banks
This aligns with what we’re seeing in-market: certainty, speed, and flexibility continue to tilt sponsor preference toward private lenders.
Meanwhile, consultants stand out for their strong bias toward traditional banks:
60% say banks are more competitive
Only 7% favor private credit
Likely reflecting a more conservative lens—or exposure to larger, more structured deals where banks still dominate.
The Bottom Line
Despite the narrative of private credit’s rise, this is still a two-horse race.
Private credit is winning on execution and flexibility
Banks remain strong on pricing and scale
And for many deals, the answer is increasingly: use both
As financing markets evolve, the firms that can arbitrage across both channels will have the edge.
III. Banks vs. Private Credit: A Market Still in Transition
The competitive dynamic between traditional banks and private credit continues to evolve—but the latest survey data suggests a market that is far from settled.
While private credit has captured significant share in recent years, particularly across sponsor-backed financing, banks are not out of the game. Instead, their competitive positioning is becoming more segmented, selective, and sponsor-dependent.
Mid-Market Remains the Core Battleground
Across all respondents, the mid-market emerges as the most competitive segment for banks, with 33% indicating this is where banks still hold ground against private credit.
This trend is even more pronounced among bankers themselves, where 37% believe banks remain most competitive in mid-market deals. The implication is clear: despite the rise of direct lenders, banks continue to leverage their balance sheet flexibility, pricing advantages, and long-standing client relationships to compete effectively in this segment.
However, this positioning is not unchallenged. Private credit’s ability to provide certainty of execution, speed, and tailored structures continues to resonate strongly with sponsors—particularly as deal complexity increases.
Large-Cap: A More Balanced Playing Field
In large-cap deals, 28% of all respondents still see banks as competitive, rising to 34% among bankers. This reflects banks’ historical strength in underwriting large, syndicated transactions and their ability to deploy capital at scale.
Yet, the relatively lower conviction from consultants (17%) suggests that outside observers see banks losing ground more quickly in this segment than banks themselves may acknowledge.
Private credit’s continued push upstream—into larger, more complex deals—is clearly reshaping perceptions. What was once a bank-dominated space is now increasingly contested territory.
The Rise of Sponsor Selectivity
One of the most telling findings is the growing importance of sponsor quality.
Among PE sponsors, the largest share (28%) believes banks are only competitive when working with top-tier sponsors. This is a critical shift: access to bank financing is no longer uniform—it is increasingly relationship-driven and reputation-based.
Banks appear to be prioritizing:
Established sponsor relationships
Proven execution track records
Lower perceived risk profiles
This selectivity reinforces a bifurcated market, where top-tier sponsors benefit from competitive tension between banks and private credit, while others may rely more heavily on direct lenders.
A Growing Perception Gap
Perhaps most striking is the divergence in sentiment across respondent groups.
Consultants are the most bearish on banks, with 31% stating banks are not competitive right now—the highest across all cohorts.
PE sponsors also show skepticism, with a combined 56% indicating either limited competitiveness or reliance on top-tier relationships.
Bankers, by contrast, remain the most optimistic, with only 15% viewing banks as uncompetitive.
This gap highlights a broader theme: market perception is shifting faster than internal conviction within banks.
What This Means for the Market
The data points to a market that is not defined by outright displacement, but by repositioning.
Banks are:
Retaining strength in mid-market and large-cap transactions
Becoming more selective in sponsor coverage
Competing on price and relationship depth
Meanwhile, private credit continues to win on:
Speed and certainty of execution
Structural flexibility
Willingness to underwrite complexity
The Bottom Line
Banks are still very much in the game—but not everywhere, and not for everyone.
As the market continues to evolve, the competitive landscape will likely hinge on deal size, sponsor quality, and execution certainty. The result is a more nuanced ecosystem, where banks and private credit coexist—but increasingly on different terms.
IV. New Private Credit’s Biggest Risk May Be Its Own Success
Private credit has spent the last several years evolving from an alternative financing solution into one of the most crowded corners of private markets. But according to PE150’s latest proprietary microsurvey, market participants increasingly believe the asset class may now be facing a different kind of threat: too much capital chasing too few disciplined opportunities.
When asked about the biggest vulnerability in private credit today, the most common response across all respondents was “Overcrowding / excess capital” (30%), narrowly ahead of illiquidity in a downturn (27%) and weak underwriting standards (25%).
The message is clear: investors are becoming less concerned about whether private credit can continue growing — and more concerned about how sustainably that growth is being underwritten.
Consultants Are Sounding the Loudest Warning
Among consultants, concern around overcrowding climbed to 35%, the highest of any respondent group surveyed.
That’s notable because consultants often sit closest to allocator sentiment across multiple managers and strategies. Their responses suggest growing unease around:
compressed spreads,
rising competition for deals,
and the increasing pressure to deploy capital quickly.
As fundraising has accelerated, so has the number of firms entering direct lending and opportunistic credit. The result is an environment where differentiation is becoming harder, while pricing discipline becomes increasingly important.
PE Sponsors Are More Focused on Downside Liquidity
Private equity sponsors, meanwhile, showed a different set of concerns.
For sponsors, illiquidity in a downturn (31%) and weak underwriting standards (31%) tied as the top vulnerabilities, while only 19% cited overcrowding.
That divergence matters.
Sponsors operate closest to portfolio company performance and refinancing risk. Their responses suggest greater focus on what happens when credit conditions tighten:
refinancing windows narrow,
defaults rise,
or lenders become less flexible during stress scenarios.
In other words, while consultants worry about market structure, sponsors appear more focused on cycle durability.
A Market Still Confident — But Increasingly Selective
Despite growing concerns, nearly 1 in 5 PE sponsors (19%) still believe there are “no major vulnerabilities” in private credit today, highlighting the continued confidence many investors have in the asset class relative to traditional leveraged finance markets.
That optimism isn’t entirely surprising. Private credit continues to benefit from:
persistent bank retrenchment,
strong demand for flexible financing,
and a still-favorable yield environment.
But the survey results also reinforce an emerging reality: the conversation around private credit is evolving from growth to discipline.
Bottom Line
Private credit remains one of the most attractive areas in alternative assets — but investors are becoming increasingly aware that scale itself can introduce risk.
The concern isn’t that private credit is slowing down.
It’s that capital may be accumulating faster than underwriting discipline can keep up.
V. The Future of Deal Financing Is Becoming More Fragmented — and More Flexible
The battle between traditional banks and private credit is no longer a zero-sum game. According to PE150’s latest proprietary Microsurvey, the next phase of private market financing is increasingly expected to revolve around hybrid capital structures, with respondents signaling that flexibility — not lender type alone — will define dealmaking over the next 2–3 years.
Across all respondents, 29% believe hybrid financing models will become the industry standard, making it the single most selected outcome in the survey. At the same time, expectations remain relatively balanced across the broader financing ecosystem: 27% expect banks to regain meaningful market share, 23% believe markets will remain fragmented, and 20% see private credit continuing to extend its dominance.
The data reflects a market that is no longer thinking in binary terms. Instead of viewing banks and private credit as competing substitutes, many industry participants increasingly see them as complementary components within the same capital stack.
The strongest conviction around hybrid financing came from consultants, where 42% selected hybrid structures as the most likely outcome for the market. That figure stands well above bankers (30%) and PE sponsors (16%), suggesting advisors are seeing growing demand for financing solutions that combine the speed and flexibility of private credit with the scale and pricing advantages of traditional banks.
Meanwhile, PE sponsors appear notably more optimistic about the return of banks. Among sponsors surveyed, 33% believe banks will regain meaningful share — the highest percentage among any respondent group. That view likely reflects improving confidence in syndicated markets, stabilizing interest rate expectations, and the desire among sponsors to reduce financing costs after several years of elevated private credit activity.
Still, private credit remains deeply embedded in the market. Nearly 30% of consultants expect private credit to further strengthen its position, highlighting the continued importance of execution certainty, bespoke structuring, and faster timelines in competitive processes. Even as banks gradually return to larger financings, private lenders continue to benefit from their ability to move quickly and structure around complexity.
Perhaps most importantly, the survey underscores that fragmentation itself may become a defining feature of the financing landscape. Rather than consolidating around a single dominant model, the market appears to be evolving toward a more nuanced ecosystem where financing structures vary significantly depending on deal size, sector, risk profile, and sponsor preference.
For private equity firms, that evolution could ultimately create more strategic optionality. Sponsors increasingly have the ability to blend syndicated loans, direct lending, structured equity, continuation vehicles, NAV financing, and bespoke hybrid solutions into a single transaction framework. As capital providers continue competing for relevance, the result may not be a winner-takes-all environment — but a more dynamic and customized financing market overall.
VI. The LP Allocation Shift: Private Credit Becomes a Core Portfolio Holding
The structural rise of private credit is not merely a story of deal flow and lender competition — it is, increasingly, a story of institutional demand. As private credit has matured into a multi-trillion-dollar asset class, limited partners around the world are repositioning their portfolios accordingly, moving the strategy from a satellite exposure to a core allocation.
The numbers are striking. Global private credit assets under management reached an estimated $2.28 trillion in 2025, up from $1.70 trillion in 2024 and less than $1 trillion just four years earlier, according to Preqin. The AIMA/ACC Financing the Economy 2025 report places the total even higher at $3.5 trillion when including infrastructure, real estate, and asset-backed credit strategies — reflecting the asset class’s rapid diversification beyond its corporate direct-lending origins. Preqin projects that private credit AUM will nearly double again to approximately $4.5 trillion by 2030, a trajectory that few other asset classes can match.
What is driving this growth? In large part, allocator conviction. According to Coller Capital’s 42nd Global Private Capital Barometer (June 2025), 45% of LPs plan to increase their allocation to private credit over the next twelve months — up from 37% just six months prior. That acceleration reflects a deliberate strategic shift rather than opportunistic positioning. Institutional investors have come to value private credit not merely for its yield premium over public markets, but for its relatively stable cash flows, senior secured positioning, and lower correlation to public equity and fixed income volatility.
The Broadening of LP Demand
The composition of LP demand is also evolving. While direct lending has historically dominated new allocations — accounting for 58% of new LP commitments to private credit in 2023 — that share declined to 50% in 2024 as investors broadened their mandates, according to With Intelligence. Infrastructure debt, asset-backed finance, and opportunistic credit are gaining traction, as allocators look to build more comprehensive “alternative credit” exposures rather than single-strategy sleeves.
The investor base is also widening beyond its traditional institutional core. The AIMA/ACC report notes that 24% of private credit AUM is now held by retail and mass-affluent investors — a share expected to grow meaningfully over the next several years as evergreen structures, BDCs, and interval funds continue expanding access to the asset class.
Implications for the Competitive Landscape
This capital inflow dynamic has direct implications for the competitive picture described throughout this report. As LP demand for private credit deepens, managers face growing pressure to deploy capital across a broader range of deal types and geographies — accelerating the upstream push into larger transactions and fueling the very overcrowding concerns highlighted in our microsurvey data.
At the same time, the structural demand for private credit from institutional portfolios provides a durable foundation that is unlikely to reverse. Regardless of near-term spread dynamics or macro volatility, the asset class has earned a permanent seat at the institutional allocation table — and that changes the long-term competitive calculus for banks and syndicated lenders alike.
Bottom Line
Private credit is no longer an alternative. For a growing share of the world’s institutional capital, it is a core allocation. The $4.5 trillion trajectory projected for 2030 is not a ceiling — it is a baseline. The asset class has crossed a structural threshold, and the implications for deal financing, competitive dynamics, and capital formation will be felt across every corner of the private markets ecosystem.
VII. The Repricing of Private Credit: Spread Compression, Yield Dynamics, and What It Means for Returns
For much of 2022 and 2023, private credit lenders enjoyed an unusually favorable pricing environment. The combination of rapidly rising base rates, bank retrenchment, and constrained syndicated market access created a window in which direct lenders could command historically wide spreads — often SOFR+600 basis points or above on first-lien sponsored transactions — while simultaneously benefiting from elevated floating-rate income as the Fed’s rate-hike cycle pushed all-in yields into the 11–13% range.
That window is now narrowing. The return of bank competition, the revival of the broadly syndicated loan market, and the sheer weight of private credit dry powder have collectively driven a meaningful compression in credit spreads over the past two years. Understanding the magnitude of that compression — and what it means for returns going forward — is essential context for anyone navigating the current financing landscape.
The Data on Spread Compression
According to Cambridge Associates’ 2025 Credit Outlook, direct lending spreads on first-lien sponsored loans had declined to approximately SOFR+525 basis points as of early 2025, down from the 2022 peaks that reached SOFR+650 to SOFR+680. That implies a compression of roughly 125–150 basis points from peak to trough — consistent with analysis from privatecapitalglobal.com, which estimates that private credit loan spreads tightened by approximately 125 basis points as lender competition resumed through 2024.
By Q1 2026, the compression has extended further. Capstone Partners’ Middle Market Leveraged Finance Update (May 2026) — citing PitchBook’s U.S. Credit Markets Quarterly Wrap Q1 2026 — notes that 84.4% of new-issue LBO deals financed through the direct lending market priced below SOFR+550. Upper middle market credits with EBITDA above $100 million are pricing even tighter, at SOFR+425 to SOFR+475, according to Capstone Partners.
Yields Remain Attractive — But the Math Is Changing
The critical nuance is that all-in yields have fallen less dramatically than spreads alone might suggest, because base rates have remained elevated relative to pre-2022 norms. The Federal Reserve cut rates three times in 2025, bringing three-month SOFR to approximately 3.7% by year-end, according to Northleaf Capital’s Q4 2025 Private Credit Market Update. Combined with current spreads, senior secured mid-market loans continue to generate high single-digit unlevered gross returns — broadly in the 9–11% range depending on credit quality and segment.
However, the forward rate environment introduces uncertainty. Northleaf projects an average base rate of approximately 3.3% over 2026–2028. If spreads continue compressing toward syndicated loan levels — currently around SOFR+370 for broadly syndicated loans (BSLs) per Cambridge Associates — the all-in yield advantage of private credit over public alternatives will narrow further. For managers, this makes underwriting discipline and portfolio construction increasingly critical.
The Return of the BSL Market as a Competitive Force
Spread compression in private credit has been accelerated by a resurgent broadly syndicated loan market. U.S. leveraged loan activity averaged approximately $300 billion per quarter in 2024 through Q3 2025, compared to an average of $120 billion over the prior three years, according to iCapital. This sharp recovery has been led by refinancing at tighter spreads, which has intensified competition for direct lending volume on larger transactions and driven pricing concessions across the market.
For private credit managers, the narrowing spread differential between direct lending and BSL execution is forcing a strategic pivot. Those competing in the upper middle market face growing pressure to differentiate on structure, speed, and relationship value — rather than pricing alone. Managers focused on the core middle market (sub-$100M EBITDA), where BSL competition is less acute, retain a more defensible spread premium.
Bottom Line
Spread compression is real, ongoing, and structural — not a temporary market anomaly. The golden age of 650-plus spread lending is behind us. But private credit’s return profile remains attractive relative to public credit alternatives, particularly for managers with disciplined underwriting, differentiated sourcing, and exposure to segments where bank and BSL competition is limited. The repricing of private credit is not an existential threat to the asset class — it is the growing pain of a market that has earned its place in the institutional portfolio. Those who adapt their return expectations and investment focus accordingly will be best positioned for the next cycle.
VIII. Conclusion: A Market at an Inflection Point
The findings across this report — drawn from PE150’s four-part microsurvey series, supplemented by the latest market data on capital flows, spread dynamics, and LP allocation trends — paint a consistent picture: private credit has won the disruption phase. The harder question now is what comes next.
The asset class has crossed from challenger to incumbent. With global AUM approaching $2.3 trillion in 2025 and institutional allocations accelerating, private credit is no longer competing for a seat at the table — it is the table, at least for a growing segment of the financing market. But incumbency brings its own pressures: compressed spreads, overcrowding concerns, rising competition from a resurgent syndicated loan market, and growing scrutiny around underwriting standards.
Five Structural Themes That Will Define the Next Phase
First, hybridization will become the dominant deal structure. The data is consistent across respondent groups: the future of financing is not banks or private credit, but banks and private credit, structured together within the same capital stack. Sponsors who can orchestrate that complexity will have a genuine structural advantage.
Second, scale creates vulnerability as much as strength. The overcrowding concern flagged by consultants in our microsurvey is directly corroborated by market data. With Preqin projecting AUM nearly doubling to $4.5 trillion by 2030, the risk is not that private credit shrinks — it is that growth outpaces the discipline required to sustain returns.
Third, spread compression is permanent, not cyclical. Private credit spreads will not return to 2022 peaks absent a major credit dislocation. Managers must adapt their return frameworks accordingly, focusing on sourcing differentiation, structural complexity, and segments where bank competition remains limited.
Fourth, the LP base is broadening and deepening. Retail and mass-affluent capital, channeled through evergreen structures and BDCs, represents the next leg of AUM growth. This democratization of access will sustain capital inflows — but also introduces new pressures around liquidity management, transparency, and investor education.
Fifth, underwriting discipline will separate the cycle winners from the cycle losers. As the 2021 vintage of private credit deals encounters stress from elevated leverage and post-COVID earnings normalization, the question of who underwrote carefully — and who chased yield — will become increasingly visible. Sponsors and LPs alike are watching.
The Path Forward
Private credit is entering a maturity phase characterized by more competition, more complexity, and more nuance. The simple thesis — that banks retreated and private lenders filled the void — is no longer sufficient to explain how this market works or where it is headed.
For sponsors, the opportunity lies in leveraging the structural flexibility that hybrid financing now enables — blending execution certainty with competitive pricing across a more sophisticated capital structure toolkit. For lenders, the opportunity lies in differentiation: deeper specialization, stronger sponsor relationships, and the underwriting rigor to navigate credit cycles that are beginning to separate managers by quality rather than by growth rate alone. For investors and LPs, the opportunity lies in manager selection: in an asset class approaching $4.5 trillion by 2030, not all managers are created equal — and the spread between top-quartile and median performers will likely widen.
The private credit power shift is real, consequential, and still unfolding. What this report makes clear is that the most important competitive battles of the next decade will not be fought at the asset class level — they will be fought at the deal level, the underwriting level, and the relationship level. That is a fundamentally more nuanced game. And it is the game that the smartest participants in private markets are already preparing to play.
Sources and References
PE150 Microsurvey Series
AIMA / Alternative Credit Council (ACC) — Financing the Economy 2025 (in partnership with Houlihan Lokey)
Preqin — Private Credit AUM Estimates and 2030 Projections (2025)
Referenced in: S&P Global Market Intelligence, “Private credit gains ground among top private equity managers,” November 13, 2025
Coller Capital — Global Private Capital Barometer, 42nd Edition (June 2025)
Cambridge Associates — 2025 Outlook: Credit Markets
Northleaf Capital — Private Credit Market Update Q3-2025 and Q4-2025
Capstone Partners — Middle Market Leveraged Finance Update (May 2026, citing PitchBook U.S. Credit Markets Quarterly Wrap Q1 2026)
privatecapitalglobal.com — Private Capital Debt Benchmarks for the New Rate Environment (September 2025)
With Intelligence — Private Credit Outlook 2025 / Private Credit Trends 2025
iCapital — Investment Essentials: Direct Lending (October 2025)
Sources and References:
x